Fundamental Views on Corporate Governance

As a company responsible for the infrastructure of society, the Company will ensure fairness and transparency in management and fulfill its duty of accountability to shareholders and other stakeholders in order to achieve sustainable growth and increase corporate value over the medium to long terms.

Overview of the Current Corporate Governance System

The Company positions its Board of Directors as the supreme organization that manages and supervises its operations. The Board of Directors is convened, in principle, every month on a regular basis and resolves the Company’s management policies and important matters related to the execution of operations in accordance with laws and regulations, the Articles of Incorporation, and the Board of Directors Rules. It also supervises the Directors' performance of their duties.
The Board of Directors consists of 11 Directors (9 male and 2 female Directors), including 4 Outside Directors. The term of office for Directors was reduced from two years to one year in June 2006 to clarify the responsibilities of the Directors for corporate management. The Board of Corporate Auditors is comprised of four Corporate Auditors (four male Corporate Auditors), including two Outside Corporate Auditors. It audits Directors' performance of their duties as an independent organization mandated by the Company’s shareholders.

Expertise and Diversity of Officers

The Company considers balance in the diversity and composition, in terms of knowledge, experience, skills and areas of expertise, of the Board of Directors overall, and appoints candidates with extensive experience as business managers and outstanding knowledge of the Company's areas of business as Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. 

Skill Matrix (as of June 29,2023)

Advisory Committees to the Board of Directors

The Governance Committee, Personnel Committee, and Compensation Committee have been established as advisory committees to the Board of Directors. These committees include outside directors among their members, and are all chaired by an outside director.

Governance Committee

Personnel Committee

Compensation Committee

Members

(June 29,2023 –)

Shuzo Sumi *Chair

(Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board

Member)

Kunio Shimada

(Lead Independent Outside Director)

Hiroshi Shimizu

(Independent Outside Director)

Hirofumi Nomoto

(Chairman Of The Board & Representative Director)

Masahiro Horie

(President & Representative Director)

Kunio Shimada *Chair

(Lead Independent Outside Director)

Reiko Kanise

(Independent Outside Director)

Midori Miyazaki

(Independent Outside Director)

Hirofumi Nomoto

(Chairman Of The Board & Representative Director)

Kazuo Takahashi

(Vice Chairman Of The Board & Representative Director)

Kunio Shimada *Chair

(Lead Independent Outside Director)

Reiko Kanise

(Independent Outside Director)

Hirofumi Nomoto

(Chairman Of The Board & Representative Director)

Roles

To deliberate corporate governance matters in general.

To deliberate on matters such as those relating to the selection of director candidates, the selectionand dismissal of representative directors and their successors, appointment and dismissal of executive officers, etc., and the appointment of Corporate Advisors, etc.

Delegated by the Board of Directors to deliberate and resolve matters relating to the allocation of compensation of directors, and the compensation of Corporate Advisors, etc.

Evaluation of effectiveness of the Board of Directors

Assessment method
The company analyzes and evaluates the effectiveness and efficiency of the decision-making process of the Board of Directors by conducting a questionnaire survey of all directors and all audit & supervisory board members and interviews with representative directors and independent officers. The results of these analyses and evaluations are evaluated by external experts (lawyers) , and then deliberated by the Governance Committee and the Board of Directors. Starting in FY2019, an ex-conternal consultant will implement this to objectively understand the future direction of the project in order to enhance its effectiveness.

Identification of and initiatives toward concerns based on evaluation of effectiveness

Recognition that the effectiveness of the Board of Directors was secured during FY2022 was confirmed. It was found that initiatives to address issues identified the previous fiscal year have been steadily implemented and the Company will seek further enhancement of the Board of Directors through implementation of individual countermeasures to address the following issues identified this fiscal year. 
 

Issue

(1) Strengthening of discussion and monitoring surrounding strategies

(2) Strengthening of Group governance

(3) Discussion surrounding enhancement of advisory committees and human resources

Process of Enhancing Business Execution, Supervisory Functions, etc.

The Company adopted the executive officer system in April 2005, aiming to promote the separation of the management and business execution functions, clearly delineate authority and responsibility, and strengthen the business operation system. Moreover, as part of the process of implementing efficient and effective corporate management, the Tokyu Group Corporate Executive Committee is convened on a regular basis as an organ that deliberates on important management issues of the corporate group consisting of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. In addition, the Management Meeting is held, in principle, each week to deliberate on and decide the fundamental policies of the Company’s business execution and important matters.
Internal audits are conducted for all aspects of the business of the Company, in order to accurately understand and verify the realities of corporate management and to set up systems needed for promoting the improvement of business operations. The results of internal audits are reported to the management team and Corporate Auditors. The Company also continuously conducts and strengthens internal audits to ensure the appropriateness of corporate management, including the corporate management of subsidiaries.

Criteria for Determining Independence of Outside Officers

In addition to criteria for independence as established by the Tokyo Stock Exchange, the Company has established its own "Criteria for Determining Independence of Outside Officers"  and designates all outside officers  who meet these criteria as independent officers.

 

■In addition to criteria for independence as established by the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Tokyu Corporation determines that persons who do not fall into any of the following categories are independent.
(1) Business executors of business partners accounting for 2% or more of Tokyu Corporation consolidated sales in any of the past three fiscal years
(2) Business executors of business partners for which Tokyu Corporation accounts for 2% or more of sales in any of the past three fiscal years
(3) Business executors of lenders accounting for 2% or more of Tokyu Corporation consolidated total assets in any of the past three fiscal years
(4) Business executors of major shareholders and investors in Tokyu Corporation with stakes of 10% or more in any of the past three fiscal years
(5) Consultants, accounting specialists, or legal specialists who receive annual compensation from Tokyu Corporation in excess of 10 million yen in any of the past three fiscal years
(6) Spouses or second-degree relatives of Directors, etc. of Tokyu Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries

Policy for determining the method of calculation of officers' remuneration

The Company's policy for determining directors' compensation is as follows. The compensation of Audit & Supervisory Board members is determined based on discussion among the Audit & Supervisory Board Members. 

 

■ Policy regarding the determination of compensation of individual directors (including compensation as executive officer in the case of directors concurrently serving as executive officers)
(1)The compensation for directors aims to further increase awareness about contributing toward increasing the medium- to-long-term corporate value as well as maximizing shareholder value. 
(2) Details and amounts are determined within a range resolved at a General Meeting of Shareholders and reflect directors' compensation levels at other listed and unlisted companies, chiefly companies that have a high public nature, as well as trends in employees' pay.  
(3) Directors' compensation comprises fixed compensation that reflects the roles and responsibilities of directors; performance-linked compensation calculated from the overall performance evaluation of the departments the respective officers are responsible for; and stock-based compensation for shareholders and directors to share value from a more medium-to-long-term perspective.
For directors who concurrently serve as executive officers, the ratio of such remuneration is approximately fixed compensation: total performance evaluation compensation: stock-based compensation = 17-26%: 64-72%: 8-12% depending on the position when the total performance evaluation is in the middle range, and varies depending on each individual’s evaluation and stock price. The composition and ratio of other directors shall be determined based on their responsibilities and other factors. 
(4) Fixed compensation is determined according to the position and whether or not the director has representative rights. 
(5) Total performance evaluation compensation is paid only to directors who also serve as executive officers, and is calculated based on a five-step evaluation based on a comprehensive evaluation assessment that takes into account indicators for each department, such as the budget achievement rate and execution rate for the department in charge, based on the medium-term management plan, etc. 
(6) With respect to stock-based compensation, the Company uses a stock delivery trust for directors concurrently serving as executive officers, the Chairman of the Board, Director & Vice Chairman of the Board, Director & Corporate Advisor, and Director & Corporate Consultant, and delivers and provides them with Company shares and cash based on stock delivery points that are granted in stages according to their positions and other factors. 
(7) Monetary compensation is paid every month. If an officer assumes office partway through the month, payment starts from the month following assumption of office. Stock compensation is delivered or provided following retirement from the position eligible for stock compensation. 
(8) The Compensation Committee is entrusted with the responsibility of deciding remuneration for each individual in accordance with (1)-(7).  The Compensation Committee comprises two outside officers and the Chairman of the Board and is chaired by an outside officer. The Committee meets in June each year, in principle, and also meets to determine changes whenever changes in positions or the details of compensation becomes necessary.   

Executive compensation

■ Total Amount of Compensation, etc. of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members

1. The total amount of monetary compensation for directors was set as up to 550 million yen annually (of which, up to 45 million yen annually for outside directors, excluding salaries for directors who are concurrently employees)through a resolution passed at the 138th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 28, 2007. (At the time of the resolution being passed, there were 18 directors, of which three were outside directors.)
2. The total amount of compensation in the form of shares for directors (excluding outside directors) was set as up to 100 million yen annually through a resolution passed at the 148th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 29, 2017. The above total amount of stock compensation was the cost calculation amount for the fiscal year in question. (At the time of the resolution being passed, there were 18 directors, of which four were outside directors.)
3. The total amount of monetary compensation for audit & supervisory board members was set as up to 90 million yen annually through a resolution passed at the 138th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 28,2007. (At the time of the resolution being passed, there were five audit & supervisory board members.)

Cross-shareholding policy

(1) Cross-shareholding policy
Through the maintenance and strengthening of its relationships with business partners, the Company holds shares that are judged to contribute to the business development of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, with a view to the smooth implementation of long-term business and financial strategies. In addition, the Board of Directors verifies the significance of holding each listed stock every year, based on qualitative perspectives related to business and financial strategies from a long-term perspective and quantitative perspectives such as dividend income and other economic rationality. If it is recognized that cross-shareholding is not appropriate based on the above-mentioned assessment, our basic policy is to review it, such as by reducing the number of shares held, considering the condition of the stock market, etc.  
As a result of verification, the Company judged that it was appropriate to maintain its cross-shareholdings as of FY2022.  


(2) Exercise of voting rights 
With regard to voting rights, we exercise them appropriately after making a comprehensive judgment based on a case-by-case assessment of whether the resolution will contribute to the enhancement of shareholder value in the medium to long term and whether it will undermine the significance of the Company holding the shares.